Asylum psychological evaluation expert | Form (I-589)
By Lisa Long, Psy.D. | Licensed Psychologist | Forensic Evaluation Specialist
Last Updated: January 26, 2026
Current Policy Context (January 2026)
The U.S. asylum landscape is undergoing significant changes. As of December 2025, USCIS placed a hold on adjudication of affirmative asylum applications (Form I-589) pending comprehensive security review. While new asylum applications may still be filed and interviews may continue, decisions on pending cases have been paused for applicants from many countries. Defensive asylum cases in immigration court remain unaffected by this USCIS pause.
Additionally, expanded travel restrictions affecting 39 countries took effect January 1, 2026, and employment authorization documents (EADs) for asylum applicants are now generally limited to 18 months rather than five years.
For attorneys and applicants: Thorough psychological documentation remains essential. Cases with comprehensive forensic evidence are better positioned for favorable outcomes once adjudications resume. Contact an immigration attorney for case-specific guidance on these evolving policies.
What This Guide Covers
Seeking asylum in the United States is a complex legal process that requires credible evidence of persecution or fear of harm. A well-documented psychological evaluation can serve as crucial supporting evidence for your case.
This comprehensive guide explains the legal requirements for asylum, how U.S. courts define persecution, the five protected grounds for asylum claims, and the specific role forensic psychologists play in strengthening asylum petitions.
Need an immigration psychological evaluation but unsure which type applies to your case?
We offer a range of expert immigration evaluations, each tailored to the legal and psychological requirements of specific case types. Visit our main service page for an overview: Nationwide Immigration Psychological Evaluations
Alternatively, complete our service request form for a personalized response with pricing, timelines, and next steps based on your specific situation: Start Your Free Case Review
We support clients nationwide through secure telehealth with licensed psychologists, interpreter access, and a streamlined 14-day turnaround.
Legal Requirements for Asylum: What You Must Prove
To be granted asylum in the United States, an applicant must provide clear and convincing evidence meeting specific legal criteria established under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA § 208).
Well-Founded Fear of Persecution
The applicant must demonstrate a significant possibility of experiencing serious harm upon return to their home country. This standard requires more than generalized fear—the threat must be realistically likely based on objective and subjective factors. Courts evaluate both the applicant's genuine subjective fear and whether that fear is objectively reasonable given country conditions (Matter of Mogharrabi, 19 I&N Dec. 439).
Persecution Based on Protected Grounds
The fear of harm must be connected to one of five protected grounds established in asylum law: race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group.
Nexus Requirement
The applicant must establish that the persecution they fear is occurring because of their protected characteristic. Demonstrating this causal connection—known as the "nexus" requirement—is often one of the most challenging elements of an asylum case (INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478).
Government Involvement or Inability to Protect
Generally, the threat of persecution must come from the government of the home country, or from groups the government is unwilling or unable to control. Private persecution may qualify when the government fails to provide adequate protection.
Additional Factors Courts Consider
Beyond the core legal requirements, adjudicators evaluate:
Consistency: The applicant's account should remain consistent across interviews, supporting documents, and testimony.
Country Conditions: Documentary evidence supporting the existence of persecution against similarly situated individuals strengthens claims.
Credibility: The immigration judge or asylum officer must find the applicant to be a truthful and credible witness—a determination where psychological evaluations can provide critical supporting evidence.
How U.S. Courts Define Persecution
The legal concept of "persecution" is central to asylum law, yet there is no single statutory definition. Courts develop the meaning through case-by-case adjudication, resulting in an evolving body of precedent.
No Definitive List of Qualifying Acts
Aside from forced abortion or sterilization (which are specifically enumerated in the statute), no official list of actions automatically constitutes persecution. Each case is evaluated on its individual facts and circumstances.
The Severity Threshold
Persecution must be severe. It exceeds harassment, discrimination, or general hardship. The harm must threaten life, liberty, or fundamental rights in a manner that is more than merely unpleasant or economically disadvantageous (Fatin v. INS, 12 F.3d 1233).
Beyond Physical Violence
Persecution encompasses more than physical harm. Severe restrictions on religious practice, political expression, or other fundamental freedoms may rise to the level of persecution. Psychological harm, when sufficiently severe, can also qualify—making psychological evaluation evidence particularly relevant in documenting non-physical persecution.
The Five Protected Grounds for Asylum
Asylum eligibility requires fear of persecution based on at least one of five protected characteristics:
Race, Ethnicity, or Tribal Affiliation
Persecution based on racial or ethnic identity, including membership in a minority group subject to violence or systematic discrimination.
Religion
Persecution for religious beliefs, practices, conversion, or rejection of religion. This includes punishment for practicing a minority faith, converting from a dominant religion, or holding atheist beliefs.
Nationality
Persecution based on national origin or citizenship, including targeting based on perceived foreign nationality within one's own country.
Political Opinion
Persecution for actual or imputed political beliefs, including harm for supporting democracy, human rights causes, or opposing government policies. Political opinion cases often benefit from psychological evidence documenting the subjective beliefs and motivations of the applicant.
Membership in a Particular Social Group (PSG)
Persecution based on shared immutable characteristics, past experiences, or characteristics so fundamental to identity that a person should not be required to change them. PSG is the most litigated protected ground and includes claims based on gender identity, sexual orientation, family membership, and other social groupings. Courts require that the group be defined with particularity and be socially distinct in the society in question (Matter of M-E-V-G-, 26 I&N Dec. 227).
Intersectionality and Overlapping Grounds
Many asylum seekers experience persecution for multiple, intersecting reasons. For example, a female political activist from a minority ethnic group may face compounded persecution. Documenting the psychological impact of these overlapping traumas requires specialized forensic assessment skills.
The Role of Forensic Psychologists in Asylum Cases
Forensic psychologists provide specialized assessments and expert analysis that can significantly strengthen asylum claims. Their expertise addresses several critical evidentiary needs:
Trauma Assessment and Documentation
Forensic psychologists evaluate the psychological effects of persecution-related trauma, identifying symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety, and other conditions commonly experienced by refugees and asylum seekers. Research consistently demonstrates that asylum seekers exhibit elevated rates of trauma-related psychopathology (Crumlish & Bracken, 2011).
Credibility Support
A central issue in asylum adjudication is the applicant's credibility. Memory inconsistencies—often cited by adjudicators as evidence of fabrication—are actually predictable neurobiological consequences of trauma. Forensic psychologists can explain how trauma affects memory encoding and retrieval, providing context that helps adjudicators properly interpret apparent inconsistencies (Herlihy et al., 2002).
Cultural Competency
Trauma presentation varies across cultures. Forensic psychologists with training in cultural factors understand how individuals from different backgrounds express psychological distress and communicate traumatic experiences. This expertise helps bridge cultural gaps between applicants and adjudicators.
Clinical-Legal Integration
Unlike general clinical evaluations, forensic asylum evaluations are specifically designed to address the legal criteria adjudicators must consider. The assessment directly links psychological findings to the evidentiary requirements for asylum, including the nexus between harm and protected grounds.
Why Forensic Evidence Carries Weight in Immigration Court
Forensic psychological reports hold significant evidentiary value because they address specific legal questions the court must resolve:
Legal Relevance
Forensic evaluations directly address the criteria asylum courts must consider, linking mental health findings to the legal grounds for protection. A well-constructed report explains not just the diagnosis but its relevance to the asylum claim.
Corroborative Function
Forensic psychologists consider all available evidence to support or contextualize claims, strengthening the overall evidentiary record. Medical evidence documenting the consequences of torture and abuse can be particularly persuasive (McKenzie, 2020).
Expert Context
Forensic psychologists can explain persecution patterns, country conditions, and how the applicant's presentation aligns with expected trauma responses. This expert contextualization helps adjudicators interpret evidence they may not otherwise understand.
Testimony Capability
When needed, forensic psychologists provide expert testimony explaining their findings under direct and cross-examination. Experience in courtroom settings enables effective communication of complex psychological concepts to legal decision-makers.
How Forensic Psychologists Support Asylum Petitions
Dr. Long & Associates provides three categories of support for asylum cases:
Comprehensive Psychological Evaluation
A detailed clinical assessment documenting the emotional, cognitive, and psychological effects of persecution. The evaluation includes clinical interview, psychological testing when indicated, and integration of collateral records.
Forensic Report and Affidavit Preparation
Written reports prepared specifically for immigration proceedings, outlining clinical findings, analyzing the impact of trauma, and explaining the specific risks the applicant would face if returned to their home country. Reports are formatted for court submission and meet federal evidentiary standards.
Expert Testimony
When required, testimony in immigration court providing expert opinions on the asylum seeker's psychological state, the credibility of their account from a psychological perspective, and the validity of their fear of persecution.
Asylum Evaluation Research: What the Evidence Shows
Understanding the research literature helps attorneys and applicants appreciate why psychological evaluations strengthen asylum cases:
Asylum Policy and Evidence Standards
U.S. asylum law requires applicants to demonstrate a well-founded fear of persecution, with the burden of proof on the applicant. Psychological evidence helps meet this evidentiary threshold, particularly when corroborating physical evidence is unavailable (Dietrich, 1988).
Factors Influencing Adjudication Outcomes
Research demonstrates significant variation in asylum outcomes based on the judge, region, and applicant's nationality. A study using data from Texas-based cases found that individual, case, and country factors all affect the likelihood of receiving asylum, highlighting the importance of comprehensive documentation (Keith & Holmes, 2009).
Mental Health Impact of the Asylum Process
The asylum process itself produces significant psychological distress. The adversarial nature of proceedings, prolonged uncertainty, and fear of repatriation contribute to elevated mental health symptoms among applicants (Crumlish & Bracken, 2011).
The Credibility Challenge
Concepts such as "well-founded fear" and "clear probability" of persecution remain subject to interpretation, creating challenges in protecting individuals facing persecution. Psychological evidence helps translate subjective experiences into forms adjudicators can evaluate (Meier, 1989).
Predictability of Judicial Decisions
Machine learning analysis found that asylum case outcomes could be predicted with approximately 80% accuracy based on judge and nationality factors, suggesting systematic patterns in decision-making that thorough documentation may help overcome (Dunn et al., 2017).
Cultural Factors in Asylum Narratives
The construction of asylum narratives is influenced by both the applicant's cultural background and the expectations of immigration services, creating potential obstacles when cultural communication styles differ from adjudicator expectations. Culturally competent forensic evaluation helps bridge this gap (Shuman & Bohmer, 2004).
The Role of Medical and Psychological Evidence
Forensic medical and psychological evaluations provide objective evidence supporting asylum claims by documenting consequences of past persecution. Clinicians play a critical role in the asylum process by providing evidence that applicants often cannot otherwise produce (McKenzie, 2020; Meffert et al., 2010).
Legal Perspectives on Clinical Documentation
Legal professionals emphasize that medical and psychological affidavits should provide clear, corroborative, and diagnostic information that reinforces applicant credibility. Well-prepared clinical documentation significantly strengthens the evidentiary record (Scruggs et al., 2016).
Frequently Asked Questions About Asylum Psychological Evaluations
How much does an asylum psychological evaluation cost?
Asylum psychological evaluations at Dr. Long & Associates are $2,500. This includes the comprehensive clinical evaluation, all psychological testing administered, and a detailed forensic report prepared specifically for immigration court submission. Payment is due prior to scheduling. We accept Zelle and major credit cards via Stripe.
How long does the asylum evaluation process take?
The evaluation itself typically requires 2-4 hours depending on case complexity, interpreter needs, and the extent of trauma history. Once the evaluation is complete, you will receive the finished forensic report within 14 days. Rush turnaround is available for cases with imminent court dates—contact us to discuss expedited options.
Can asylum evaluations be conducted via telehealth?
Yes. All of our asylum evaluations are conducted via secure, HIPAA-compliant telehealth. Dr. Long & Associates is licensed to provide evaluations to clients located in 42 states through PSYPACT (the Psychology Interjurisdictional Compact). Telehealth delivery has been widely accepted in immigration court proceedings and does not diminish the evidentiary value of the evaluation.
What does the psychologist assess in an asylum evaluation?
The forensic psychologist conducts a comprehensive assessment examining trauma history, current psychological symptoms, diagnostic impressions (including PTSD, depression, and anxiety), credibility factors, and the psychological basis for fear of return. The evaluation directly addresses the legal criteria for asylum, linking clinical findings to the evidentiary requirements immigration judges must consider.
Will the psychologist testify in immigration court if needed?
Yes. Dr. Long is available to provide expert testimony in immigration court proceedings when required. Expert testimony fees are billed separately from the evaluation and are quoted based on case requirements, preparation time, and hearing duration. Many cases are decided on documentary evidence alone without requiring live testimony.
What should I bring to my asylum evaluation appointment?
Bring any relevant documentation including your asylum application (Form I-589), personal declaration or statement, country condition evidence, medical records documenting injuries from persecution, prior mental health records if any, and any photographs or other evidence related to your claim. The more documentation available, the more thorough the evaluation can be.
Do you provide interpreters for asylum evaluations?
Yes. We coordinate professional interpreter services for clients who are not fluent in English. Interpreter costs are included in the evaluation fee for Spanish-language evaluations. For other languages, interpreter services are arranged at cost. Dr. Long also speaks conversational Spanish, Arabic, and Russian, which can facilitate rapport even when a formal interpreter is used.
Start Your Asylum Psychological Evaluation
Dr. Long & Associates provides expert asylum psychological evaluations nationwide through secure telehealth.
Our Process:
Complete our Service Request Form
Receive a detailed response within 24-48 hours with pricing, timeline, and next steps
Secure scheduling with interpreter services as needed
Comprehensive evaluation via telehealth
Court-ready report delivered within 14 days
Professional Disclaimer
This educational content provides general information about asylum law and psychological evaluations. It does not constitute legal advice, medical advice, or establish a provider-client relationship. Immigration law is complex and changes frequently; applicants should consult with a qualified immigration attorney regarding their specific circumstances. The information presented reflects conditions as of the publication date and may not reflect subsequent policy changes.
Dr. Long & Associates provides psychological evaluation services only. We do not provide legal advice or representation. All evaluations are conducted by licensed psychologists in accordance with applicable professional and ethical standards.
References
Crumlish, N., & Bracken, P. (2011). Mental health and the asylum process. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, 28(2), 57-60.
Dietrich, R. (1988). United States immigration policy and the asylum process. Harvard International Law Journal, 29(1), 191-207.
Dunn, M., Sagun, L., Şirin, H., & Chen, D. (2017). Early predictability of asylum court decisions. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on AI and the Law.
Herlihy, J., Scragg, P., & Turner, S. (2002). Discrepancies in autobiographical memories—implications for the assessment of asylum seekers: Repeated interviews study. BMJ, 324(7333), 324-327.
Keith, L. C., & Holmes, J. S. (2009). A rare examination of typically unobservable factors in US asylum decisions. Journal of Refugee Studies, 22(2), 224-241.
McKenzie, K. C. (2020). Medical evaluation in support of asylum claims. In Clinical Assessment of Asylum Seekers (pp. 89-104). Springer.
Meffert, S. M., Musalo, K., McNiel, D. E., & Binder, R. L. (2010). The role of mental health professionals in political asylum processing. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 38(4), 479-489.
Meier, R. H. (1989). The political refugee: A study of fear of persecution. Texas International Law Journal, 24, 71.
Scruggs, E., Guetterman, T. C., Meyer, A. C., VanArtsdalen, J., & Heisler, M. (2016). "An absolutely necessary piece": A qualitative study of legal perspectives on medical affidavits in the asylum process. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 44, 72-78.
Shuman, A., & Bohmer, C. (2004). Representing trauma: Political asylum narrative. Journal of American Folklore, 117(466), 394-414.
This content was prepared by Dr. Lisa Long, Psy.D., a licensed psychologist with over 10 years of experience conducting forensic immigration evaluations. Dr. Long has completed more than 300 immigration psychological evaluations and has testified as an expert witness in federal immigration proceedings. She is a member of the American Psychology-Law Society (AP-LS, Division 41 of APA) and the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS).
Home | Our Team | Blog | Contact | FAQ | Podcast
Nationwide psychological evaluations via secure telehealth across 42 PSYPACT states, including Chicago, Houston, Dallas, Phoenix, and Seattle. View all service areas.
For Attorneys: Submit a Referral
Services: Immigration Evaluations | Court-Ordered Forensic Evaluations & Consultations | Clinical Mental Health Assessments
PSYPACT Licensed (APIT #8593) — Verify Credentials | david+referral@drlisalong.com